Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » Judge will not dismiss lawsuit claiming Poland Spring water is not from a spring By Reuters
    News

    Judge will not dismiss lawsuit claiming Poland Spring water is not from a spring By Reuters

    userBy userDecember 31, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    By Jonathan Stempel

    (Reuters) – A federal judge in Connecticut refused to dismiss a long-running lawsuit accusing the former Nestle (NS:) Waters (NYSE:) North America of defrauding consumers by labeling its Poland Spring bottled water as “spring water.”

    While rejecting some claims in the proposed class action, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer in New Haven called it an open question whether Poland Spring qualified as spring water under the laws of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.

    Poland Spring is now owned by Primo Brands, following multiple corporate transactions. The Tampa, Florida-based company had no immediate comment on Tuesday.

    Consumers sued Nestle Waters, then owned by Nestle, in 2017, saying it deceived them into overpaying for Poland Spring with labels declaring it to be “Natural Spring Water” or “100% Natural Spring Water.”

    The plaintiffs said “not one drop” of the 1 billion gallons sold annually in the United States came from a natural spring, and that the actual Poland Spring in Maine “ran dry” two decades before Nestle bought the brand in 1992.

    In seeking a dismissal, Nestle Waters said geologists and officials in the eight states agreed that Poland Spring complied with a U.S. Food and Drug Administration rule defining spring water, and each state authorized its sale as “spring water.”

    But the judge cited a former Syracuse University earth sciences professor hired by the plaintiffs, who said Nestle Waters appeared to use man-made springs and extracted pond water and other surface water instead of “true” spring water.

    Meyer agreed with Nestle Waters that the plaintiffs lacked standing to demand new labels, because they now knew the alleged “truth” about Poland Spring and could buy other brands of water.

    Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Nestle Waters had been Nestle’s North American bottled water business. Nestle sold it in 2021 to two private equity firms, which renamed it BlueTriton. That company merged in November with the former Primo Water (NYSE:) to form Primo Brands.

    The case is Patane v. Nestle Waters North America Inc, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut, No. 17-01381.





    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleCyberark stock soars to all-time high of $333.58 By Investing.com
    Next Article ROSEN, A LEADING AND LONGSTANDING FIRM, Encourages Quanterix Corporation Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Worried about retirement? Here’s how big a SIPP needs to be to live comfortably

    May 24, 2025

    Up 44% in 6 months, the Lloyds share price is going great guns!

    May 24, 2025

    Vodafone’s dividend yield falls below 5%. Is the stock still worth considering?

    May 24, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d