Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » Ineffective carbon offset – Nature Climate Change
    Carbon Credits

    Ineffective carbon offset – Nature Climate Change

    userBy userFebruary 6, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Raphael Calel of Georgetown University, USA, and colleagues provide systematic evidence on carbon offset misallocation by examining wind farms constructed in India through to 2013. They conclude it is highly likely that at least 52% of the wind farms supported by the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) would have been built anyway, which means the programme approved more than 28 million tonnes of CO2 emissions. If the same rate of misallocation applies to all CDM projects across the world, it could lead to 6.1 billion more tonnes of CO2. Furthermore, the authors find the allocation of offsets compares unfavourably with a lottery-based approach, showing that there is room for improvement in the design and verification process.

    Original reference: Am. Econ. J. 17, 1–40 (2025)



    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous Article20 is Plenty in Wales — Streetsblog USA
    Next Article ViaSat shares jump on earnings beat, maintained outlook By Investing.com
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Harmonised framework within Asean will attract investors: global carbon trading body

    May 18, 2025

    UN Body Adopts Groundbreaking Standards to Guide Carbon Market Under Paris Agreement – DA NEWS | Home

    May 17, 2025

    Startup awarded $50 million for volcanic rock technique with potential to address growing crisis: ‘This … is going to go a long way’

    May 17, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d